Glucometer Configurations: Accu-Chek / RALS
16 followers
0 Likes
We are having continual scanning issues with our glucometers and our EPIC team is suggesting that we try altering the information that is being picked up in the patient's barcode. Currently our patient bracelets are designed to pick up the CSN number to interface the result to the patient's chart/encounter.
For your glucometers, does your interface utilize the CSN (Contact Serial Number) or the HAR (Hospital Account Record) in order to transmit the result to the patient's chart in EPIC? Any advice is greatly appreciated!
For your glucometers, does your interface utilize the CSN (Contact Serial Number) or the HAR (Hospital Account Record) in order to transmit the result to the patient's chart in EPIC? Any advice is greatly appreciated!
15 Replies
Reply
Subgroup Membership is required to post Replies
Join POCT Listserv now
Suggested Posts
| Topic | Replies | Likes | Views | Participants | Last Reply |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Does a PharmD qualify you as a Technical Consultant | 0 | 0 | 172 | ||
| Upgrading Middleware Validations Plan (RALS) | 4 | 1 | 357 | ||
| Humidity Monitoring | 10 | 0 | 556 |
We have always used the CSN for scanning with Accu-cheks and have been using EPIC since 2012. Recently we switched from RALS to TELCOR and went from linear barcodes to QMR barcodes but it is still the CSN used and no issues. Is there a problem with the wristband configuration of the actual barcode or the material of the wristband is too shiny? Your Epic team should be able to reach out to other accounts and see what they are using. It shouldn't be the CSN that's the problem.
No problems that I am aware of as long as POC Operator does scan CSN and not MRN if using the registration labels which have both barcodes.
Are your barcodes not actually scanning or is the information not being picked up correctly? At our facility , the patient gets a new CSN and wristband as they move for procedures like going for an x-ray . It will still scan but the result will get held up in the data manager if the patient isn't re-wristbanded each time. Picking up extra digits is strange since the masking shouldn't change because the patient stays longer . We use QMRs now for Accu-cheks so that won't help you. We did have to keep the linear for i-stats. Are other departments having trouble scanning the bracelets? like pharmacy?
I have found multiple issues with scanning patient's armbands using the Inform II. We have the paper armbands and use the patient id that is on a 1D linear barcode. Our linear barcode is really long and narrow and sometimes gets wrapped around the patient's wrist. When this happens and the user holds the device farther back to catch the whole thing, the scanner will come in contact with the 2D barcode that is also on the wristband and gives either an obscure number or the number that is on the 2D barcode. I have asked the users to try and cover the 2D barcode with a finger or something to try and block it. I think most people do this now and it works, but you'll always have those people who just won't even try to fix the incorrect number.
My Inform II devices are also really old too and many times the scanner won't work because the battery needs to be replaced. It seems like if the battery is old and dying the whole device wouldn't work, but I have found that most of the time when there are weird problems with the Inform II like the scanner won't stay on or it will scan the QC and strips barcode but not the patient's wristband, etc... if I change the battery, it works fine again. The majority of the batteries I've had to change have been in the devices since the hospital started using them (so I've been told) and were manufactured between 2016 and 2018.
Lastly, I have also found that when the device is reportedly "broken" and won't scan correctly, it is because either the scanner window is dirty or there is a partial haze on it after someone cleaned it with the cleaning wipes. Some cleaning wipes will leave a haze when the device is left to air dry. You can wipe the haze away with a Kimwipe or something similar. There are a few other scanning issues I've seen. Some of them have been addressed by others in their replies, but they aren't as frequent for me as the 3 I mentioned.
I hope you find a resolution.
Good Luck!