PT/INR meters/analyzers for ER/possible stroke patients
All of the PT/INR meters/analyzer that I know off have been validated for monitoring oral anticoagulation therapy. Using these meters on ER patients, specifically, possible stroke patients would be considered off label testing.
Are any of you using or know of a meter/analyzer that has been validated for testing PT/INR on this group of patients? Patients who are not necessarily on any anticoagulation therapy?
Thank you in advance for any information you can provide in regards to this topic.
Slavica
Slavica S. Stoyanovich, MT(ASCP)
Point-of-Care Coordinator
Saint Joseph Physician Network, POL Consultant
Saint Joseph Health System I Trinity Health
1915 Lake Avenue I Plymouth, Indiana 46563
Ph: 574-948-4286 I Cell: 574-780-3039 I Fax: 574-948-5458
Topic | Replies | Likes | Views | Participants | Last Reply |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hemochron Sig Elite use outside of manufacturer temperature range | 0 | 0 | 28 | ||
EPOC scanner issue post software update | 6 | 0 | 288 | ||
PFA-100 | 0 | 0 | 117 |
We agree with you Slavica. We have not been able to locate a POC analyzer for this purpose either.
I am getting my Hemochron Signature Elite validated for this very purpose in 2 weeks. Accriva has the claim to use the device for stroke, therefore it is not off label. They are able to detect a true clot on their cartridge, which is something no other POC platform has.
This is a problem for us as well. We currently have iSTAT PT-INR in our ED and have wrestled with the language in Abbott's Cartridge/Test information sheet which while it indicates "for use with oral anticoagulant monitoring" it does not include prohibitory language forbidding its use on those not on oral anticoagulant. Interesting to see that many of you are also interpreting the language as "not OK" for non-oral anticoag patients.
I know some in our system are exploring Hemachron SigElite for this purpose. As much as I do not want to introduce yet another non-waived device to our ED staff, this may become inevitable.
I didn't realize the Hemochron was FDA approved for other uses than just monitoring warfarin therapy. Can you send me the literature to support?
As for the iSTAT. My medical director called and talked to "someone" at iSTAT who confirmed in can ONLY be used if the patient is taking warfarin to monitor therapy. Their statement to him was that it could not even be used in a situation were a patient was told to stop warfarin prior to a procedure.
I am away at a conference until August 5. If you have an urgent POC issue, Pauline Kamenyi at 24219 or Meike Talley at 29397 for Sinai or Alana Agustin at 55816 for NW. You can also vocera point of care testing.
Thanks
Joann O'Connor
POCC for Lifebridge Health
joconnor@lifebridgehealth.org
410-601-5673
>>> "Mary Blank via POCT Listserv (Groupsite)" 08/02/16 13:10 >>>
Thank you for your reply James.
I spoke with Abbott's technical support today about PT/INR on I-STAT. He told me that doing PT on ER/possible stroke patients would be off label. Honestly, I was suppressed at his sincerity.
Slavica
I am away at a conference until August 5. If you have an urgent POC issue, Pauline Kamenyi at 24219 or Meike Talley at 29397 for Sinai or Alana Agustin at 55816 for NW. You can also vocera point of care testing.
Thanks
Joann O'Connor
POCC for Lifebridge Health
joconnor@lifebridgehealth.org
410-601-5673
>>> "Slavica Stoyanovich via POCT Listserv (Groupsite)" 08/02/16 13:15 >>>
Thanks for that information Mary. Since even patients that are 'supposed' to be on oral anticoagulant often present for testing during lapses in their medication routine, it sounds like iSTAT PT-INR is inappropriate for this - and perhaps most - settings.
Wow, interesting Slavica - and thank you for that. Yes, I am surprised at his sincerity as well - at least they are taking a stand one way or another with the issue.
I am away at a conference until August 5. If you have an urgent POC issue, Pauline Kamenyi at 24219 or Meike Talley at 29397 for Sinai or Alana Agustin at 55816 for NW. You can also vocera point of care testing.
Thanks
Joann O'Connor
POCC for Lifebridge Health
joconnor@lifebridgehealth.org
410-601-5673
>>> "James Beck via POCT Listserv (Groupsite)" 08/02/16 13:21 >>>
Thank you all for your responses. This is extremely helpful.
I am very impressed with what I have seen so far on Hemochron Signature Elite. I need more literature that confirm the claims.
I will very much appreciate if any of you can forward literature you have or direct me to a helpful link.
Thanks! Slavica :-)
I think the Hemochron Sig Elite is a good device, but is not the best suited for POC settings in that it does not upload results automatically without operator intervention and/or power-cycling the device. This makes it definitely out of sync with most POC devices.
James,
We are going to implement a Hemochron Sig Elite here in our Adult tower STAT ED Lab, could you give me a heads up on what to expect going forward. They are wanting to have all their ED RN's have access and run this machine. I personally don't think that is a good idea. What are your thoughts?
Correlations
Studies
Connectivity
Penny Rose
I am away at a conference until August 5. If you have an urgent POC issue, Pauline Kamenyi at 24219 or Meike Talley at 29397 for Sinai or Alana Agustin at 55816 for NW. You can also vocera point of care testing.
Thanks
Joann O'Connor
POCC for Lifebridge Health
joconnor@lifebridgehealth.org
410-601-5673
>>> "Penny Rose via POCT Listserv (Groupsite)" 08/03/16 08:47 >>>
Hi Penny,
I have not seen correlations with the Signature Elite PT cuvette yet. We did do correlations with the ITC (Accriva) PT-INR instrument nearly 10 years ago and they were quite good. That POC instrument is no longer on the market, unfortunately, especially unfortunate in that it was also CLIA-waived. Accriva now offers only their PT-INR methods done on the Sig Elite (non-waived).
While the technology and correlations for PT-INR on the SigElite may well be just fine, I have concerns about: