Autoverification under CAP
2 followers
0 Likes
Our lab is under CAP accreditation. The question has arisen whether instruments that directly enter results into the patient's EMR, such as the ISTAT, fall under Auto-verification, or is the interface considered just that, and interface. Any input would be appreciated!
2 Replies
Reply
Subgroup Membership is required to post Replies
Join POCT Listserv now
Suggested Posts
| Topic | Replies | Likes | Views | Participants | Last Reply |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NICU Pipettes | 2 | 0 | 159 | ||
| iSTAT ACT issues | 2 | 0 | 330 | ||
| Nova StatSensor Calibration verification Issues | 2 | 0 | 216 |
I do a yearly review of all POC results downloading to the LIS; checking that correct results, comments, reference ranges, etc. I do each iSTAT cartridge type and profile and try to get varied examples for each parameter that may star out, be > or <, critical highs/lows. Ivy
In that Autoverification generally indicates that a set of logic rules are written into the LIS (specifically) for manipulation of the result, I would say that your iSTAT interface does not. But I can see why you're asking and it is definitely a bit of a gray area. But until CAP adds more detail to their standard, I think you are justified in saying that it does not fall under Autoverification.