i-STAT ACT k vs Hemochron

1 followers
0 Likes

 


We would like to switch our ACT's performed by CVOR Perfusionist from Hemochron tubes to i-STAT ACT K.  We already use i-STAT ACT in all of our other areas and would like to have all areas on the same platform.


If you are using i-STAT ACT K  in your CVOR area, what is your cut off for heparin--our current protocol is ACT <480 then heparin is given. Our perfusionist are looking to see what other hospitals are doing since i-STAT and Hemochron are not linear, and do not want to increase heparin dosing Thanks for any help you can offer!!


Kim Ballister, MT (ASCP)


Point of Care Consultant


Direct Dial: 336.832.8134 -- Pager: 336.319.2972 -- Fax: 336.832.7762


Website: conehealth.com


Kim.Ballister@conehealth.com


 

12 Replies

Kim,


We transitioned from the Hemochron to the i-STAT ACT cartridges cartridge back in 2003.  To summarize we run the ACT Kaolin cartridge in the "prewarm" mode" (we run our Celite cartridges in the "nonwarm" mode).  We used >480 sec as the target to go on bypass with the Hemochron.  Based on our correlation study and linear regression, the staff now use >450 sec for the i-STAT Kaolin cartridge. 


A few years after going live with the i-STAT we wanted to consolidate our ACT cartridges and asked the perfusion staff to do a side by side correlation between the Celite and Kaolin cartridges to see what the target range would be if they transitioned from the Kaolin the Celite cartridge.  Based on the linear regression analysis between the two types of cartridges, the staff would now need to use >535 sec on the Celite cartridges vs. >450 sec on the Kaolin.  The surgeons did not want to wait the extra time to go on bypass therefore we have continued with the two types of cartridges in-house. 


As an aside, we chose to run the Celite cartridges in the "nonwarm" mode because there was better correlation with our existing Hemochron times.  The "nonwarm" mode is really a misnomer.  The cartridges are warmed regardless of whether they are run in the "prewarm" or "nonwarm" mode.  i-STAT put a "fudge factor" in the "nonwarm" mode to equate the time to that of the Hemochron.  Thus, we did not have to change any of our target times for all of the other areas performing ACTs when we made the transition from the Hemochron to the i-STAT. 


If you have any questions I would be happy to speak with you live.  We served as a beta site when i-STAT was developing the test and spent the better part of a year running correlations in the various areas that perform the testing.  We did comparisons between the newer Hemochron device at the time (The Response), the Signature and the i-STAT run in both prewarm and nonwarm modes.

Thanks Andrea, can you send me your contact information? My email is listed above


Kim

Can you please share the istat vs hemochron data?  


 


michelle_johnson@memorial.org

Hello,


I would also like to see your data.


Thanks,


Reine

My Cardiac Cath Lab currently use Signature elite.  They use two different cartridges:


1. ACT-LR for Cardiac Cath patient


2. ACT Plus for open heart surgery done in the "Hybrid" room


I would like to use iSTAT ACT cartridges for both useages, thus eliminating having two cartridges.  Do you know of someone who has done a correlation between iSTAT ACT and Hemochron ACT-LR?


Thanks:


Robert Newberry, MT(AMT)


rnewberry@yumaregional.org


CELL: 928-246-9623


Point of Care and Education Specialist


 

Attachment. ACT from CLN.pdf


The iSTAT Cartridge Information sheets in the iSTAT System Manual indicate both their Celite and Kaolin methods are calibrated to match Hemochron prewarmed tube test methods, but nothing about their cartridge methods.  But the attached graph on the last page of the 2002 article from the ACT guru Marcia Zucker might be of some help, but it only compares all Hemochron methods, tube and cartridge.

Hi,


Nice article but noted that it was published in 2002, prior to the reformulation of heparin. That caused big headaches as our providers were very upset that they started to notice that the ACT results were not as responsive to the new heparin.  Does anyone know if this study was repeated more recently?


Thanks,


Reine

What do you mean by newer heparins?  LMW heparin?

The change was in the way that the heparin activity is measured and led to a decrease in the potency of the heparin, not a change in the way the ACT's responded.  It now takes more heparin to see the same anticoagulant effect than it did 10 years ago.


 


Every ACT is different and the comparison is different in each institution and often in each department in each institution.  There is no substitute for having your clinicians do the comparison and determining the new target time based on data you have collected.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/dat.20434


Apparently in 2009, there were changes made in the pharmacy manufacturing that changed how heparin acted.  This affected ACT testing too.  I had just started at CHW and walked into this fire storm.


Reine

Reine - wow - I had no idea!

Andrea, could you please email me your data from the comparisons between iSTAT ACTs and Hemochron?


Thanks!


Gloria.maclean@stclair.org

Reply
Subgroup Membership is required to post Replies
Join POCT Listserv now
Kim Ballister
over 5 years ago
12
Replies
0
Likes
1
Followers
3441
Views
Liked By:
Suggested Posts
TopicRepliesLikesViewsParticipantsLast Reply
GH100s, Telcor, & Epic
Beverly Stewart
about 3 hours ago
1063
Beverly Stewart
about 2 hours ago
Cepheid Xpert HCV
Anastasia Augustine
about 3 hours ago
0044
Anastasia Augustine
False Positive Urine Pregnancy Tests - SURE-Vue Urine kits
Amanda Casavant
4 days ago
50304
Amanda Casavant
4 days ago