Non-waived Proficiency testing Joint Commission Requirements
24 followers
0 Likes
Hello,
I recently had a Joint Commission Inspector tell me that our hospital didn't have to perform Non-waived Proficiency testing on analytes that aren't considered "Primary". I am considering this because it will save me time and the hospital money. What are your thoughts on this?
I recently had a Joint Commission Inspector tell me that our hospital didn't have to perform Non-waived Proficiency testing on analytes that aren't considered "Primary". I am considering this because it will save me time and the hospital money. What are your thoughts on this?
6 Replies
Reply
Subgroup Membership is required to post Replies
Join POCT Listserv now
Suggested Posts
Topic | Replies | Likes | Views | Participants | Last Reply |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creatinine Fail AQH-A 2025 | 1 | 0 | 168 | ||
ACT Reportable Range Verification | 7 | 1 | 369 | ||
pH Testing for Gastric Secretions | 0 | 0 | 163 |
You also don't have to do PT on non-regulated analytes. You will have to follow QSA.01.05.01 to semiannually evaluate accuracy and reliability of those results.
We chose to no longer do PT on ACT testing as the PT samples were packaged the same as Hemochron QC causing us to fail some surveys due to operator technique errors. It also happened to be a non-regulated assay. Each survey was nerve racking and were glad to part ways with PT for that test!
We do not do PT's on analytes where we are not the gold standard/primary method. The primary method performs the PT's and then we do method comparisons every 6 months. I just called CAP about this last week because I wanted to put documentation in our binders. They confirmed that this is acceptable.
We are JC inspected and not CAP so I can't speak to what CAP requires.
(If I am wrong about this, I would be STOKED to hear it)