High Sensitivity Troponin on iSTAT

20 followers
0 Likes

Hello everyone,

My site is currently working on creating an Epic build for the NEW high sensitivity troponin cartridge, but there is no plan in place as this is very new for POC. I requested that two order codes be built, one that is interfaced through RALS into our LIS and one for manual entry. We are hitting roadblocks with needing a RALS upgrade and mirth conversion to interface this cartridge. Has anyone started their LIS order build for this cartridge yet? I am questioning delta calculations and gender specific reference ranges. I would love to chat and get a better grasp on which way I should be leading this new build. I am also open to discussions regarding what everyone is doing for their validation studies. 

Please reach out if you have any insight!
 
Ashley Kopp
732-836-4787
ashley.kopp@hmhn.org

5 Replies

We are also looking at bringing on the i-STAT hs-troponin. We have Telcor, and I don't think we have any issues with the build. My question is about how everyone is handling the protocol for interpreting results. We have Roche hs-troponin T on our lab instrumentation, and i-STAT is hs-troponin I. We are working on what we will use for our cutoffs for results--rule in or rule out. There isn't any literature out there yet, since this is so new. Does anyone have this set up yet? Any ideas are welcome.
kathleen.david@tricore.org

You could do a clinical concordance study.   Test acute chest-pain specimens simultaneously on the i-STAT hs-cTnI and Roche hs-cTnT assays. Then compare each result to its assay-specific 99th-percentile cutoff and calculate the positive and negative agreement. 

Has anyone gone live with the hs-Troponin i-STAT cartridge? If so how have you integrated the test in the patient work-up?

We are wrapping up our validation and I wondered how anyone else's looks? We are comparing the i-STAT hsTrop to the Beckman hsTrop (been in use for quite awhile now). I was also wondering what sort of comment anyone is adding the i-STAT result indicating the testing/cut-off differences and/or the difference from in-lab testing? Also any physician education happening? Any conversation on what anyone else is doing would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks-
Tracoe
tracie.popejoy@promedica.org

With those of you who have successfully completed the validation process, would you be willing to share any of your process to those of us who are just starting? I ordered a bulk supply of the cTnI cartridges to tide us over until we wrapped up with a previous project, so we're in the beginning phase of validations. Thank you in advance to those who would be willing to lend any support. 

Reply
Subgroup Membership is required to post Replies
Join POCT Listserv now
Ashley Kopp
5 months ago
5
Replies
0
Likes
20
Followers
535
Views
Liked By:
Suggested Posts
TopicRepliesLikesViewsParticipantsLast Reply
POC ammonia test
Jake Fray
2 days ago
00161
Jake Fray
2 days ago
Glucose Meter Strip Validations
Adelina Wright
2 days ago
40320
Jeremy MacDonald
2 days ago
FOB - moving away from POC
Brian Castle
3 days ago
100488
Jeremy MacDonald
2 days ago