AVOX Peer Data Review

Hi everyone. Long time reader. Currently (and for at least 9 years), we submit our liquid QC data to an online portal for the AVOX. I'm relatively new to my position and I'm questioning the benefit of this peer review. I'm looking to streamline our monthly review of QC data and was going to go the route of an internal statistical review of our QC for trends and NOT to submit the data for peer review. Knowing the optic filters are meant to detect dirty optics and theoretically would prevent a shift in results, what does everyone do? Are you submitting the results for peer review and using that to identify negative trends? Are you reviewing 6 months back (or more) worth of QC data within your institution for negative trends instead of peer review? Many thanks!