ADT Feed and middleware

9 followers
0 Likes

Looking for advice keeping our ADT feed to our middleware cleaned up. We have certain things blocked from crossing - like pre reg accounts but are looking to regulate it more. I have gotten a list of HIS locations and can ask the IT team to block locations that will obviously never have POC testing (OT, PT, etc). 

We are having increased issues with unnecessary encounters feeding over and then the middleware seeing those as a more recent open encounter and posting POC results to them. We use MRN for patient ID. Have most of you moved away from MRN and now use FIN (account number) for admission/patient ID? 

2 Replies

ADT lists are challenging to maintain.  I would recommend using the account number as patient identifier whenever possible as this does assist with posting the result to the correct encounter.  Partnering with the EMR team to encode the account number in barcode labels (inpatient and ambulatory) assists with using correct identifier as the account numbers are difficult to find  and manually enter into a POCT device.  You could also work with your middleware vendor to make rules to manage ADT - eg. setting auto discharge times based on patient class.

We spent a lot of time/meetings on this in the past 6 months after converting over to Telcor/QML and Epic.
We engaged the ADT team, registration and Telcor to help us clean up what was coming in and how patients were being discharged.
Telcor gave is a summary list of all the patients in the ADT database by patient class.  Then we had to determine what each class represented and if it was a inpatient or outpatient class type... and determine how they were being discharged or like you said, blocked from being added altogether.

class examples:
code:     class               type
IP  = Inpatient            Inpatient        ADT feed sends discharge message
RAD = Radiology     Outpatient       auto discharged after 24 hours


Many patient classes ended up getting automatic default discharge dates added to them.

Due to registration errors and miscellaneous it is still acknowledged that the ADT list in QML will still have to be cleaned up periodically, annually?  every 2 years?




Reply
Subgroup Membership is required to post Replies
Join POCT Listserv now
Danyel Olson
almost 2 years ago
2
Replies
0
Likes
9
Followers
449
Views
Liked By:
Suggested Posts
TopicRepliesLikesViewsParticipantsLast Reply
Roche Chemstrip specific gravity
Laura Ball
18 minutes ago
0021
Laura Ball
18 minutes ago
Anybody have experience with the Actalyke?
Edith Synnefakis
about 16 hours ago
0082
Edith Synnefakis
about 16 hours ago
Cal/Ver Istat pCO2
Autilia Sisti
about 16 hours ago
10129
Marcelino Gabriel
about 15 hours ago