Electronic Temperature Monitoring Review
12 followers
0 Likes
For those of you that have electronic temperature monitoring, how often are you documenting that it's been reviewed in the software? Or are you documenting review at all? We are CAP and I don't see a standard that addresses the frequency of review, only that it doesn't have to be done daily.
2 Replies
Reply
Subgroup Membership is required to post Replies
Join POCT Listserv now
Suggested Posts
| Topic | Replies | Likes | Views | Participants | Last Reply |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electronic Temperature Monitoring Review | 2 | 0 | 66 | ||
| Nitrazine Reference Range | 3 | 0 | 141 | ||
| Comparability of >2 Non-Waived Devices (epocs) | 2 | 0 | 178 |
It is organization policy driven as this is the standard for Joint Commission organization “The laboratory monitors temperature-controlled spaces and equipment at frequencies established by the laboratory, using manufacturers' guidelines. The temperature is documented.”
Sincerely,
Alma
“Far and away the best prize that life offers is the CHANCE to work hard at work worth doing” – Theodore Roosevelt
Alma Calzado-Knudson, MBA, CLS, MT (ASCPi & AMT)
Manager, Lab Quality and Point of Care Testing
Student Education Coordinator
[cid:image001.png@01DB0B5D.2F734870]
[cid:image002.png@01DB0B5D.2F734870]1531 Esplanade Chico CA 95926
•530-332-7360 (Main Lab) l 530-332-7362 (Direct) l 254-722-5388 (Mobile) / [cid:image003.png@01DB0B5D.2F734870] 530-893-6809
• alma.calzadoknudson@enloe.org
“Together you and I will Each Accomplish More as we WORK towards achieving a common goal – Patient Safety and Satisfaction”